问题如下:
I defined two classes:
class A { def method1 = this }
class B extends A { def method2 = this }
val b = new B
Then I checked the type of b.method1:
scala> b.method1.getClass
res29: Class[_ <: A] = class B
In this case, I cannot use
b.method1.method2
:scala> b.method1.method2
<console>:11: error: value method2 is not a member of A
b.method1.method2
So I have to define A and B like this:
class A { def method1: this.type = this }
class B extends A { def method2: this.type = this }
val b = new B
Now I check the type of
b.method1
:scala> b.method1.getClass
res31: Class[_ <: B] = class B
Here
b.method1.method2
works:scala> b.method1.method2
res32: b.type = B@4ff3ac
My question here is what does it mean by saying
Class[_ <: A] = class B
and Class[_ <: B] = class B
? And why does the first doesn't work as Class[_ <: A] = class B
seems to say that it's also class B?
Reactormonk很好地解答了我的疑问:
Let's split the expression
Class[_ <: A] = class B
. The first part, Class[_ <: A]
tells you what the compiler knows at compile time, that b.method1
returns something of type Class[_ <: A]
. The second part, class B
mentions that you have a class B
as value, but the compiler doesn't know that. That's runtime information.this.type
specializes the method for subclasses, where the type inferred from a plain this
doesn't.
没有评论:
发表评论